The Irony of Fish: A Tail of Two Cities

I made a fascinating discovery this weekend in NYC.  Visiting several fancy-pants food stores, I headed, of course, to the fish sections to see what’s what.  We’re talking Eataly, Dean & Deluca, and Citarella.  Here’s what I found:

At Eataly, the product was good, but not exemplary.  Decent salmon, sole, sword, tuna, striper.  The high point was the striper roe, which looked beautiful.  Prices were high, but reasonable.

At Citarella, everything looked good, but again there was nothing special about the product.  It was like seeing broccoli and cauliflower when what you want are Shanghai bok choy, hedgehog mushrooms, and golden beets.  Prices were about 1/2 of what they are charging are Eataly.

At Dean & Deluca, the high points were beautiful Florida grouper–a nice, thick cut–and tuna, labeled just as tuna, when it was, in fact, albacore, which is nowhere near as wonderful as yellow fin or blue fin.  Prices were good.

Here’s the point: In NYC, I think the chefs are using the best fish, the most expensive, fattiest stuff, the fish that sings with flavor.  Ordinary consumers don’t have their access.  It’s one reason why so many of the restaurants in NYC are so good: The chefs drop the bucks on products.  They have to: The competition demands it, customers can taste the difference, their pride is noteworthy.

In contrast, in Boston, we have New Deal Fish: Here you find fish that is light years better than three of the fanciest fish purveyors in Manhattan.  When I’m there, I have to limit myself to four meals as everything looks and tastes amazing.  We’re talking hirame, toro, blue fin, striper, hiramasa, hamachi, salmon collar, gorgeous Portuguese sardines, etc.

In Boston, most chefs are not serving these cuts in as great a frequency as in Manhattan.  The food costs too much; they serve fish of lesser quality that increases their profit.  Most of them simply don’t care.  The result?  Consumers who know how to cook fish have access to astonishingly good product that is better than what’s served in most restaurants in Boston.  Exceptions?  Legal Sea Foods, Craigie on Main, Market, B & G Oyster, Island Creek, O Ya.  (Two of these restaurants have their own private sources [Legal Sea Foods, Island Creek Oysters]; one is crazy-expensive [O Ya]; one costs an average of $100 per person, which is equal to eight meals of fish from New Deal at home; one is pitch perfect; and, one is not terribly expensive, but is mostly raw oysters.

Ironic, no?  One city has great fish restaurants and ordinary markets.  One city has a great fish market and ordinary restaurants.

Wait, I know, you could call this: A Tail of Two Cities!

 

fish on a hook, sport fishing  Stock Photo - 9770025

 

About these ads

One thought on “The Irony of Fish: A Tail of Two Cities

  1. G’s ! I haven’t fished in Maryland in more than 40 years ~ but I had no idea there were catsifh like than in the Potomac! That is OUTRAGEOUS! That is a nice fish! I lived in Ohio 30 years. Across the street from my parents’ house is a pay-lake where they commonly catch flat-head catsifh over 40#. I saw a picture of one they stocked which weighed 76# ! I never caught a catsifh more than about 5#.I really want to fish in the ocean more. Unfortunately I don’t have a boat. I have access to surf, but I have seldom caught much ~ and it usually has been sand sharks &/or skates. From boats I have fared much better: I caught two striped bass about 25# each. I haven’t caught fluke with any consistency, but I have caught them periodically from boats.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s